Friday, July 28, 2006
Who's the LGBBC Queen of Evil
I vote Sue, but she's not evil. I really disagree with the term, but Sue and others love it- so lets turn a mirror on them.
What do you call it when someone consistantly describes people's views they disagree with as 'hate speech?' Without looking anything up, I can think of words and terms like ignorant, manipulative, impatient, close-minded, diversionary, sarcastic, slanderous, censorship, negative, condescending, biased, degrading, arrogant, presumptive... annoying.
Sue and many of the LGBBC absolutely writhe over people like Coulter and Robinson. They should take after Chris Matthews, who actually reads what he disagrees with. Thanks to Sue, I read the Matthews interview with Coulter. Outstanding, funny, yet too dark for my taste.
Why is it local liberals seek to censure conservative writers? Sue and Media Matters grossly mislead us about the tone and what was said in the Matthews interview. Why would they do that? Surely they understand Coulter uses the same dark wit Wonkette, Sue and Media Matters employ.
Are they dimwitted? Hardly.
Childish? Absolutely. They just don't like it when the same harsh tactics they love to prod opponents with are used on them.
I don't read the Rhino or Yes anymore, but if Yes pulls Coulter because of a few whining bullies who have to read publications just to have their opinions validated, it deserves to go the way of Air America.
What do you call it when someone consistantly describes people's views they disagree with as 'hate speech?' Without looking anything up, I can think of words and terms like ignorant, manipulative, impatient, close-minded, diversionary, sarcastic, slanderous, censorship, negative, condescending, biased, degrading, arrogant, presumptive... annoying.
Sue and many of the LGBBC absolutely writhe over people like Coulter and Robinson. They should take after Chris Matthews, who actually reads what he disagrees with. Thanks to Sue, I read the Matthews interview with Coulter. Outstanding, funny, yet too dark for my taste.
Why is it local liberals seek to censure conservative writers? Sue and Media Matters grossly mislead us about the tone and what was said in the Matthews interview. Why would they do that? Surely they understand Coulter uses the same dark wit Wonkette, Sue and Media Matters employ.
Are they dimwitted? Hardly.
Childish? Absolutely. They just don't like it when the same harsh tactics they love to prod opponents with are used on them.
I don't read the Rhino or Yes anymore, but if Yes pulls Coulter because of a few whining bullies who have to read publications just to have their opinions validated, it deserves to go the way of Air America.
Subscribe to Posts [Atom]